tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186830196259994932.post8450363224595197254..comments2023-10-12T07:59:39.719-04:00Comments on Wandering through: Proposition hateLightlighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14728861437303871153noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186830196259994932.post-90964243385131288452008-11-10T01:07:00.000-05:002008-11-10T01:07:00.000-05:00Another reason might be the survival instinct insc...Another reason might be the survival instinct inscribed within every member of a species: "Man on man love does not bear fruits..." But, of course, this atavistic fear of the "gay", particularly (fear) of this kind, is characteristic of the lowest of our kind. You must love them conservatives, they're so very close to nature...<BR/><BR/>But we should be so thankful that we have our scientists to tell us all how it is! It's been decided: women are to blame for the gays being gay and the gayest of the gay! (of course, how didn't I think about that?!) Baffled? You should read this article from my favorite leisure reading - Psychology Today: "Finding the Switch" - http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/index.php?term=pto-4578.html<BR/><BR/>also <BR/><BR/>"Are men becoming extinct?" - http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/news/story.html?id=b7774b35-9a90-4cdc-93e6-e3f3e3bab234<BR/><BR/>and <BR/><BR/>"The end of males? Mouse made to reproduce without sperm" - http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/04/0421_040421_whoneedsmales.html<BR/><BR/>Are you getting the idea? Who needs "them" anyways? Let's rejoice!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186830196259994932.post-13441067809594264902008-11-01T00:42:00.000-04:002008-11-01T00:42:00.000-04:00Thanks for suggesting this reason. Yes, this must ...Thanks for suggesting this reason. Yes, this must be an argument. Of course there are flaws in it...first of all, marriage does not equal family in many cases if we take family as anything more than just the legal association. And then secondly, it is important and necessary to reconceptualize the building blocks of society- and many have evolved (women's roles, nuclear family etc.) - so why not this one? Not too convincing, no? But at least that is some semblance of an argument...<BR/><BR/>Amazing indeed.Lightlighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14728861437303871153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186830196259994932.post-37510103865578227232008-10-30T23:42:00.000-04:002008-10-30T23:42:00.000-04:00is it not more about the belief that "marriage = f...is it not more about the belief that "marriage = family"? and if gay marriage is legalized than it effectively means a re-conceptualization of family - "the building block of every society."<BR/><BR/>it's amazing that a modern, legally constructed procedure defines what is in fact the most primitive association of human life.chanbonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01238437843684667158noreply@blogger.com